Quarterly Publication

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Environmental Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22105/bdcv.2021.142227

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) and environmental quality contributes very significantly to all parts of the world, especially developing countries. These two factors have been so important that are known as the engine of economic growth and progression. This paper aimed to examine the association between environmental sustainability index, economic growth, and FDI in selected developing countries. Estimation of long-run coefficients is carried out by using Dynamic Ordinary Least Square (DOLS) and Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS), and the estimation of short-term coefficients and causality relationships using Pooled Mean Group (PMG) method in panel data for intervals 2000-2020. The outcomes of long-term estimates of variables indicate that each variable is statistically significant; so that, FDI has the greatest effect on the economic growth. The environmental quality index had a significantly positive impact on the economic growth; so that, after FDI variable, it significantly affected economic growth in selected developing countries. There is a significantly positive relationship between FDI and quality of environment and economic growth in short term. In the equation of environmental quality index, economic growth, FDI and trade openness show a significantly negative impact on quality of environment in the short term. Generally, as it was observed from the short-term and long-term relationships, the association between economic growth and quality of environment is a two-way causality relationship.

Keywords

  1. Ssali, M. W., Du, J., Mensah, I. A., & Hongo, D. O. (2019). Investigating the nexus among environmental pollution, economic growth, energy use, and foreign direct investment in 6 selected sub-Saharan African countries. Environmental science and pollution research26(11), 11245-11260.
  2. Fakher, H. A. (2019). Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index). Environmental Science and Pollution Research26(10), 10276-10291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04452-3
  3. Aydin, C., Esen, Ö., & Aydin, R. (2019). Is the ecological footprint related to the Kuznets curve a real process or rationalizing the ecological consequences of the affluence? evidence from PSTR approach. Ecological indicators98, 543-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.034
  4. Baloch, M. A., & Suad, S. (2018). Modeling the impact of transport energy consumption on CO 2 emission in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL approach. Environmental science and pollution research25(10), 9461-9473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1230-0
  5. Allard, A., Takman, J., Uddin, G. S., & Ahmed, A. (2018). The N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical evaluation using a panel quantile regression approach. Environmental science and pollution research25(6), 5848-5861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0907-0
  6. Alsamara, M., Mrabet, Z., Saleh, A. S., & Anwar, S. (2018). The environmental Kuznets curve relationship: a case study of the Gulf Cooperation Council region. Environmental science and pollution research25(33), 33183-33195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3161-1
  7. Tang, S., Selvanathan, E. A., & Selvanathan, S. (2008). Foreign direct investment, domestic investment and economic growth in China: a time series analysis. World economy31(10), 1292-1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01129.x
  8. Jorgenson, A. K. (2007). Does foreign investment harm the air we breathe and the water we drink? a cross-national study of carbon dioxide emissions and organic water pollution in less-developed countries, 1975 to 2000. Organization & environment20(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026607302153
  9. Nair‐Reichert, U., & Weinhold, D. (2001). Causality tests for cross‐country panels: a New look at FDI and economic growth in developing countries. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics63(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.00214
  10. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?. Journal of international economics45(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0
  11. Klasra, M. A. (2011). Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth in Pakistan and Turkey: An investigation using bounds test. Quality & quantity45(1), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9272-5
  12. Grossman G., & Krueger A. B. (1991). Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. Combridge, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w3914
  13. Wacziarg, R., & Welch, K. H. (2008). Trade liberalization and growth: new evidence. The world bank economic review22(2), 187-231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn007
  14. Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? firm-level evidence from France. Review of world economics150(2), 241-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-013-0175-0
  15. Bigsten, A., Gebreeyesus, M., & Söderbom, M. (2016). Tariffs and firm performance in Ethiopia. The journal of development studies52(7), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1139691
  16. Zhang, K. H. (2001). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth in China?. Economics of transition9(3), 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00095
  17. Musibah, A. S., Shahzad, A., & Fadzil, F. H. B. (2015). Impact of foreign investment in the Yemen's economic growth: the country political stability as a main issue. Asian social science11(4), 102-116. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.665.8438&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  18. Almfraji, M. A., & Almsafir, M. K. (2014). Foreign direct investment and economic growth literature review from 1994 to 2012. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences129, 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.668
  19. Carkovic, M., & Levine, R. (2005). Does foreign direct investment accelerate economic growth. Does foreign direct investment promote development195. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2003.00066.x
  20. Curwin, K. D., & Mahutga, M. C. (2014). Foreign direct investment and economic growth: new evidence from post-socialist transition countries. Social forces92(3), 1159-1187. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot128
  21. Hakimi, A., & Hamdi, H. (2016). Trade liberalization, FDI inflows, environmental quality and economic growth: a comparative analysis between Tunisia and Morocco. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews58, 1445-1456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.280
  22. Fakher, H. A., Ahmadian, M., Abedi, Z., & Shaygani, B. (2018). Bayesian econometrics approach in determining of effecting factors on pollution in developing countries (based on environmental performance index). Pollution4(3), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2018.243987.335
  23. Adhikary, B. K. (2015). Dynamic effects of FDI, trade openness, capital formation and human capital on the economic growth rate in the least developed economies: evidence from Nepal. International journal of trade, economics and finance6(1), 1-7.
  24. Olasode, S. O., Raji, O., Adedoyin, O. A., & Ademola, I. A. (2015). Trade openness and economic growth a reflection from Nigeria (1981-2012). International journal of economics, commerce and management3(5), 1-820.
  25. Yusoff, M. B., & Nuh, R. (2015). Foreign direct investment, trade openness and economic growth: empirical evidence from Thailand. Foreign trade review50(2), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0015732515572055
  26. Bibi, S., Ahmad, S. T., & Rashid, H. (2014). Impact of trade openness, FDI, exchange rate and inflation on economic growth: A case study of Pakistan. International journal of accounting and financial reporting4(2), 236-257.
  27. Fakher, H. A., Panahi, M., Emami, K., Peykarjou, K., & Zeraatkish, S. Y. (2021). New insights into development of an environmental–economic model based on a composite environmental quality index: a comparative analysis of economic growth and environmental quality trend. Environmental energy and economic research5(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22097/eeer.2021.280746.1192
  28. Fakher, H. A., Panahi, M., Emami, K., Peykarjou, K., & Zeraatkish, S. Y. (2021). New insight into examining the role of financial development in economic growth effect on a composite environmental quality index. Environmental science and pollution research28(43), 61096-61114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15047-2
  29. Fakher, H. A., Panahi, M., Emami, K., Peykarjou, K., & Zeraatkish, S. Y. (2021). Investigating marginal effect of economic growth on environmental quality based on six environmental indicators: does financial development have a determinative role in strengthening or weakening this effect?. Environmental science and pollution research, 28(38), 53679–53699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14470-9
  30. Tao, S., Zheng, T., & Lianjun, T. O. N. G. (2008). An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: a panel cointegration approach. China economic review19(3), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2007.10.001
  31. Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2010). Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy policy38(8), 4057-4063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.031
  32. Fakher, H. A., Panahi, M., Emami, K., Peykarjou, K., & Zeraatkish, S. Y. (2021). New insight into development of environmental-economic model based on a composite environmental quality index: an application of principal components analysis. Journal of decisions and operations research6(2), 209-183. https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2021.276820.1334
  33. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The review of economic studies47(1), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  34. Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical economics60, 13-50.
  35. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  36. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory20(3), 597-625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
  37. Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2001). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  38. Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Review of economics and statistics83(4), 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
  39. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A panel bootstrap cointegration test. Economics letters97(3), 185-190.
  40. Mark, N. C., & Sul, D. (2003). Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long‐run money demand. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics65(5), 655-680.
  41. Maeso-Fernandez, F., Osbat, C., & Schnatz, B. (2006). Towards the estimation of equilibrium exchange rates for transition economies: Methodological issues and a panel cointegration perspective. Journal of comparative economics34(3), 499-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.05.003
  42. Ozturk, I. (2010). A literature survey on energy–growth nexus. Energy policy38(1), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.024
  43. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American statistical association94(446), 621-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2670182