Quarterly Publication

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Research Department, Research Center «NATURAL INFORMATICS», Russia, Novosibirsk

10.22105/bdcv.2021.142371

Abstract

Neural networks with deep learning and reinforcement are able to compose poetry and music, draw paintings, and write short stories, as well as come up with scripts for films. Functional ensembles of harmoniously interacting intellectual agents with living information can virtually model creativity for various spheres of life activity. Virtual modeling of creativity by harmoniously interacting intellectual agents is carried out based on living creative processes represented by acts of creation accumulated by humanity in a certain sphere of life. Live information of creative acts of creation for functional ensembles from harmoniously interacting intellectual agents is revealed from the effective creative practice of specialists in specific conditions and presented in the format of smart ethical communicative-associative cases. To model creativity, a virtual environment of a certain sphere of activity is formed, in which the ensemble gives birth to a creative fruit according to the plan of a specialist. Functional ensembles of harmoniously interacting intellectual agents with live creative practice can cooperate with a person, and can also independently virtually model the creative creation of new designs of a specialist, if the ensemble has enough acts of creation.

Keywords

  1. Bryndin, E. (In Press). Information essence of spiritual substance and universe and man in cosmology. Saudi journal of humanities and social sciences, 6(12).
  2. Bryndin, E. (2021). Functional and Harmonious Self-organization of Large Intellectual Agent Ensembles with Smart Hybrid Competencies. International journal of wireless & mobile networks (IJWMN), 13(5), 1-13.
  3. Bryndin, E. (2020). Creative communication safe ethical artificial intelligence in the era of technological development. Software engineering8(3), 13-23.
  4. Bryndin, E. (2020). Communicative-associative development of smart artificial intelligence by criteria with the help of ensembles of diversified agents. International journal of intelligent information systems9(4), 24-34.
  5. Bryndin, E. (2020). Formation of technological cognitive reason with artificial intelligence in virtual space. Britain international of exact sciences (BIoEx) journal2(2), 450-461.
  6. Bryndin, E. (2021). Formation of international ethical digital environment with smart artificial intelligence. Automation, control and intelligent systems9(1), 22-33.
  7. Bryndin, E. (2019). Collaboration of intelligent interoperable agents via smart interface. International journal on data science and technology5(4), 66-72.
  1. Bryndin, E. (2020). Technology self-organizing ensembles of intelligent agents with collective synergetic interaction. Automation, control and intelligent systems, 8, 29-37.
  1. Banerjee, S. (2020). A framework for designing compassionate and ethical artificial intelligence and artificial consciousness. Interdisciplinary description of complex systems: INDECS18(2-A), 85-95.
  2. Papadopoulos, G. T., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2021). Towards open and expandable cognitive AI architectures for large-scale multi-agent human-robot collaborative learning. IEEE access9, 73890-73909.
  3. Chacón, A., Ponsa, P., & Angulo, C. (2020). On cognitive assistant robots for reducing variability in industrial human-robot activities. Applied sciences10(15), 5137. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155137
  4. Wang, Y. (2020, November). How will autonomous systems and cognitive robots augment human intelligence. The 2020 future technologies conference (FTC’20), Vancouver, Canada.
  5. Wang, Y. (2021, September). Emerging technologies for autonomous behavior generation at run-time by cognitive robots. Int’l conf. on robot intelligence technologies and applications (RITA’21), Porto, Portugal.
  6. Zhang, T., Zeng, Y., Pan, R., Shi, M., & Lu, E. (2021). Brain-inspired active learning architecture for procedural knowledge understanding based on human-robot interaction. Cognitive computation13(2), 381-393.
  7. Sugali, K., Sprunger, C., & Venkata, N. I. (2021). Software testing: issues and challenges of a rtificial intelligence & machine learning. International journal of artificial intelligence and applications (IJAIA)12(1), 101-112.
  8. Babulak, E. (2021). Third millennium life saving smart cyberspace driven by AI and robotics. COJ robotics & artificial intelligence1, 1-2.
  9. Bryndin, E. (2021). Implementation of competencies by smart ethical artificial intelligence in different environments. Software engineering,8, 24-33.
  10. Buck, P. (2013). How nature works: the theory of self-organized criticality. : Librocom, 1-276.
  11. Bryndin, E. (2019). Supercomputer BEG with artificial intelligence of optimal resource use and management by continuous processing of large programs. International journal of research in engineering1(2), 9-14.
  12. Gershenson, C. (2020). Guiding the self-organization of cyber-physical systems. Frontiers in robotics and AI7, 41. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00041